On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 7:35 PM, Paul Goyette <p...@whooppee.com> wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Ryota Ozaki wrote: > >> Module Name: src >> Committed By: ozaki-r >> Date: Tue Jun 21 10:18:27 UTC 2016 >> >> Modified Files: >> src/tests/net/route: t_route.sh >> >> Log Message: >> Tweak route get outputs to make tests work >> >> "expire" value of route get output is unexpectedly a negative value >> on rump kernel for some reasons and the tests almost always fail >> on babylon5. So just ignore it to make tests work for now. Should >> fix it in the future. > > > Wouldn't it be better to mark the test as "Expected Failure" ?
No because the tests pass on normal (fast enough?) machines, although the tests sometimes fail even on such machines (I guess because of load). I guess the unexpected behavior stems from rump.route implementation (or rump kernel) and doesn't happen on non-rump environments. I don't have idea to fix it for now. ozaki-r