> On Apr 7, 2015, at 1:27 AM, Ryota Ozaki <ozak...@netbsd.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Nick Hudson <sk...@netbsd.org> wrote: >> On 04/07/15 04:19, Ryota Ozaki wrote: >>> >>> Module Name: src >>> Committed By: ozaki-r >>> Date: Tue Apr 7 03:19:25 UTC 2015 >>> >>> Modified Files: >>> src/sys/arch/arm/ep93xx: ep93xx_intr.c >>> src/sys/arch/arm/ixp12x0: ixp12x0_intr.c >>> >>> Log Message: >>> Add missing #include <arm/cpu.h> >>> >> <sys/lwp.h> is preferred, I think > > I see. It works for me too. I'll change so. > > Just curious, why is <sys/lwp.h> better? > Because it is MI while <arm/cpu.h> is MD?
arm/cpu.h has a dependency on sys/lwp.h
