In article <26607.1424011...@splode.eterna.com.au>, matthew green <m...@eterna.com.au> wrote: > >> > Also, I think you might want to keep the print when the >> > checksum is wrong. >> >> If we keep this print, then we keep a lot of other prints. So we don't >keep it. > >i don't follow. > >usually these messages are the only real indication of what is >actually wrong, and they aren't log spew problems. > >what are you trying to solve by removing them? and what is this >list of "lot of other prints"? each one should be considered on >its own pros/cons.
I agree, the printfs are VERY useful. They are the only indication to what's wrong when mount returns EINVAL. If you are mounting a filesystem and it does not work, you usually end up putting them back :-) christos
