On Apr 3, 7:57am, m...@eterna.com.au (matthew green) wrote: -- Subject: re: CVS commit: src/sys/dev/raidframe
| kernel configuration changes are not solutions, so 2 and 3 are out. | | if we do 4, we should instead add an option to mark something as a | 'soft root', and leave the current semantics alone. the machines i | have that are now not going to reboot properly are both used | remotely, so changing semantics about how they work seems like a | bad idea. i'm pretty sure i'm not the only one who does this. | i think i like this the best. Sure, we can add -A softroot. Do we want to rename the current option to -A hardroot? If that's the consensus, I can go ahead. christos
