On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 12:40:12AM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote: > > > Reminds me: should/can __UNCONST() be revisited w.r.t. the thread below? > > > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2013-May/014371.html > > > >How/why? Yes, it's unsafe. That's the *point*. > > Well, there is an advantage that the FreeBSD one has over ours. It can be > used in c++ with -Wold-style-cast, if defined as: > > #define __DECONST(t, a) const_cast<t>(a)
That, and why is it cast to an unsigned long and not uintptr_t? - Jukka.
