In article <20130401132606.8cc2997...@rebar.astron.com>,
Christos Zoulas <chris...@zoulas.com> wrote:
>
>| Furthermore, was it safe to add a new pthread_condattr_setclock(3) function
>| without libpthread minor bump?  I'm afraid pkgsrc ruby193 (and other)
>| binaries built on 6.1 silently fails on 6.0.1.
>
>It was a mistake, we should have bumped.

Note, that bumping would have just changed the nature of the failure, would
not have fixed the problem.

christos

Reply via email to