On Fri, 14 Dec 2012, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:53:24AM -0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
While we're making sure to free() things, should we not also defend
against memory leaks in the case where an option is used more than once?
While we are here, I wonder why sysmon(9) does not follow the common
guidelines w.r.t. for instance queue(3). I know quite well that none of
this is your making, but smalll refactorings like this could make the code
more understandable to other people.
There's lots of clean-up work to do here. Yes, it needs to be done, but
I just haven't had the time or energy to dive into it deep enough!
I promise, I will get to it. I just can't promise when. :)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| Customer Service | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee.com |
| Network Engineer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at juniper.net |
| Kernel Developer | | pgoyette at netbsd.org |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
