On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 08:25:11PM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> There is no portable way to do this; sigbus according to ToG does not
> define what si_addr contains.
I read it differently:
The <signal.h> header shall define the siginfo_t type as a structure,
which shall include at least the following members:
int si_signo Signal number.
int si_code Signal code.
int si_errno If non-zero, an errno value associated with
this signal, as described in <errno.h>.
pid_t si_pid Sending process ID.
uid_t si_uid Real user ID of sending process.
void *si_addr Address of faulting instruction.
int si_status Exit value or signal.
long si_band Band event for SIGPOLL.
union sigval si_value Signal value.
This is from:
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/signal.h.html
I think we should modify the test to use RAS_START() and RAS_END() to verify
the faulting code address and ignore the associated data address.
Martin
