joerg@ wrote: > On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 07:35:02PM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote: > > yamt@ wrote: > > > > > > Module Name: src > > > > Committed By: dholland > > > > Date: Fri Feb 24 16:06:39 UTC 2012 > > > > > > > > Modified Files: > > > > src/lib/libc: shlib_version > > > > > > > > Log Message: > > > > Note that gets() is finally dead in C11 and can be removed if we ever > > > > bump libc. > > > > > > it doesn't sound good or realistic to me. > > > > Indeed. Can you please remove this entry? > > > > Removing use of deprecated functions in NetBSD tree is the right thing, > > but it doesn't mean stopping C89/C99 support in NetBSD environment. > > Having __warn_references() for such functions is enough for users. > > I disagree on this. gets(3) is actively harmful, so moving it into > libcompat sounds perfectly sane.
How can you support/control/update third party products not to use deprecated functions? Are you claiming NetBSD should ignore such silly applications, while you are also blaming ISO C11 *_s functions suck? ;-p In libc implementaion, we should consider support of STANDARD (including compat support) first, before individual design issue. --- Izumi Tsutsui
