On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:07:34PM +0400, Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote: > > Log Message: > > There are some places where C99 allows a restrict modifier (and posix > > demands it), but C++ does not allow it. So add a C only version of > > __restrict, which expands to nothing if compiling C++. > > See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49347 for a discussion. > > That feels bogus. What's wrong with with replacing [restrict] with > equivalent *restrict syntax that is also valid for C++?
I would prefer to keep it as close to the posix standard as possible - but otherwise nothing is realy wrong with that (assuming I don't have to figure out the right sequence of stars and modifiers ;-}) Martin
