On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 12:36:32PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote: > > the problem is that now the code performs different operations > > based upon DIAGNOSTIC or not. it's not about whether it's wrong > > or right, but that it's different. DIAGNOSTIC shouldn't do more > > or different things, just check stuff and assert if bad. > > > > if the hack works for DIAGNOSTIC, it seems generally right and > > should be enabled for everyone now, until the real fix is > > implemented. > > Seconded. Either that, or the DIAGNOSTIC printf which spams the > console should be removed (I'm not sure why it has been added in the > first place)
Yeah... though I don't actually know what it's about, ISTM that if there's a harmless spammy printout, the right hack until things can be fixed properly is to silence the printout. Removing mappings can be expensive. -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
