On Dec 27, 5:56pm, Marc Balmer wrote:
} Am 06.08.11 21:52, schrieb John Nemeth:
} > Module Name: src
} > Committed By: jnemeth
} > Date: Sat Aug 6 19:52:49 UTC 2011
} >
} > Modified Files:
} > src: BUILDING
} >
} > Log Message:
} > Add description of MKKMOD, part of PR misc/45216
}
} I wonder, if instead of duplicating the information here, we should
} instead point to the mk.conf manual page, so that this information has
} to be maintained in one place only?
BUILDING documents how to use build.sh. You would have to check
to see if all the same variables are available, and if not, document
them appropriately. Duplication of information isn't necessarily a bad
thing. Although, I guess at minimal there should be comments in each
file pointing at the other one so people know to update both.
} > Modified files:
} >
} > Index: src/BUILDING
} > diff -u src/BUILDING:1.92 src/BUILDING:1.93
} > --- src/BUILDING:1.92 Sat Jan 29 16:56:26 2011
} > +++ src/BUILDING Sat Aug 6 19:52:49 2011
} > @@ -234,6 +234,11 @@
} >
} > Default: ``yes''
} >
} > + MKKMOD Can be set to ``yes'' or ``no''. Indicates whether kernel
} > + modules are built and installed.
} > +
} > + Default: ``yes''
} > +
} > MKLINT Can be set to ``yes'' or ``no''. Indicates whether
lint(1)
} > will be run against portions of the NetBSD source code
during
} > the build, and whether lint libraries will be installed
into
} >
}
}-- End of excerpt from Marc Balmer
