Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@britannica.bec.de> writes:

> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 11:25:34AM +0900, tsugutomo.en...@jp.sony.com wrote:
>> Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@netbsd.org> writes:
>> 
>> > Log Message:
>> > Switch to SSE code, since our gas supports it now.
>> >
>> >
>> > To generate a diff of this commit:
>> > cvs rdiff -u -r1.6 -r1.7 src/lib/libm/arch/i387/s_copysign.S
>> > cvs rdiff -u -r1.5 -r1.6 src/lib/libm/arch/i387/s_copysignf.S
>> 
>> Is the change done in s_copysignf.S correct?
>
> It works, but why do you think it is incorrect?

I should ask if it is `what you intended' instead of `correct'.

Since what you did for thses two files are quite opposite, I guess one
of the changes is not waht you want.

For s_copysignf.S (not s_copysign.S), you simply removed already #if 0
outed code which uses pand/por instruction and it disagrees with commit
message.

enami.

Reply via email to