On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 12:53:28AM +0000, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: > > (one nfsro test currently fails with EROFS vs. EACCES. Hopefully > > someone else can debate the correct errno) > > the NFS ACCESS procedure, which is used for open time permission checks, > does not have a way to distinguish EROFS and EACCES. ie. EACCES is > the expected behaviour in this case.
Shouldn't the nfs client know that it's supposed to be readonly? Or is this a case where the nfs client is read-write but the server isn't? -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org