On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 23:41:00 +0100, Adam Hamsik wrote: > Subject: Re: /var/lock > From: Adam Hamsik <haa...@gmail.com> > Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 23:41:00 +0100 > Cc: source-changes-d@NetBSD.org > To: Alan Barrett <a...@cequrux.com> > > > On Jan,Tuesday 4 2011, at 8:56 AM, Alan Barrett wrote: > > > On Tue, 04 Jan 2011, Adam Hamsik wrote: > >> I would like to have something persistent between reboots. I > >> have found that we already have /var/spool/lock. Therefore > >> /var/spool/lock/lvm/ seems to be might preferred place. Do you agree ? > > > > I had forgotten about /var/spool/lock; it's been a long time since I > > used UUCP. Given that it exists, /var/spool/lock/lvm seems fine. > > > >> Also /var/spool/lock is not mentioned in hier. > > > > That should be fixed. > > Ok I will change it to /var/spool/lock/lvm tomorrow and I will update > hier to mention those directories, too. Is that ok ?
IMO, no. As I explained upthread, our /var/spool/lock is specifically for uucp, see its permissions. Please don't create /var/spool/lock/lvm -uwe
