> >> -wrong initialization reported in a followup to PR bin/43336 > >> (looks harmless because it applies to zero-initialized memory, so > >> LIST_INIT() is a no-op) > > > > Does malloc(3) return zero-initialized memory? > > Not unless you asked for it with M_ZERO.
Note it's malloc(3) inside !_KERNEL block for fsck_ffs(8) to replay WAPBL journal, so it could be seriously harmful on recovery. --- Izumi Tsutsui
