On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:57:27 +0200 Joerg Sonnenberger <jo...@britannica.bec.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 08:43:33PM +0400, Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 16:24:40 +0000, Tom Spindler wrote: > > > > > > src/sys/sys: exec_elf.h > > > > > > > > Log Message: > > > > Replace the current usage of Elf64_Half with Elf64_Word and rename > > > > NetBSD specific Elf64_Quarter to Elf64_Half. This restores compatibility > > > > with the common ELF specifications. > > > > > > I believe this change is what's causing alpha to blow up: > > > > > > /src/nbsrc/external/bsd/libdwarf/dist/dwarf_dump.c:884: warning: format > > > '%u' expects type 'unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'Elf64_Word' > > > /src/nbsrc/external/bsd/libdwarf/dist/dwarf_dump.c:886: warning: format > > > '%u' expects type 'unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'Elf64_Word' > > > > > > There's (still) a ton of lint warnings in libdwarf, but they don't seem to > > > have changed for i386, at least. > > > > > > sys/arch/alpha/include/elf_machdep.h: > > > > /* > > * Alpha ELF uses different (non-standard) definitions of Elf64_Sword > > * and Elf64_Word. > > */ > > typedef int64_t Elf64_Sword; > > #define ELF64_FSZ_SWORD 8 > > typedef uint64_t Elf64_Word; > > #define ELF64_FSZ_WORD 8 > > That violates the ELF API as specified by SCO again. Is there any reason > why Alpha has to be special and can't just use the standard types? > > Joerg also, why does alpha use non standard platform magic number? -- NetBSD - Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability
