enami tsugutomo <tsugutomo.en...@jp.sony.com> wrote: > > > > > > Why XC_PRI_BIT is not placed at LSB instead MSB? > > > > Because you would lose the value (note, it is not a pointer). > > A flag bit at LSB can be preserved by incrementing the counter by 2, > can't it?
Not really, since it is advancing by CPU count. Anyway, what's the point? > Subtraction should be used to care counter wrap around that makes it > easier. Did you calculate at what rate and how long one would need to flood xcall broadcasts to overflow it even with one bit taken? I did. :) > > enami. -- Mindaugas
