On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 07:30:54PM +0000, David Holland wrote: > of which at least the 0 case is clearly incorrect...
That obviously depends on the meaning you give the output, which is not well defined in the man page and obviously a lot people around here disagree about. I would say the list of prime factors of 0 is empty, so "0:\n" makes perfect sense to me. Martin
