On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:05:02PM +0300, Jukka Ruohonen wrote: > > What's the currently-blessed alternative? > > 2004: > > APPLICATION USAGE > > "For applications portability, the utime() function should be used to set > file access and modification times instead of utimes()."
oh goody, yet another slightly-different variant to cause confusion. I don't suppose their new invention is the same as (or even compatible with) the utime() we already have that's marked obsolete? > So I guess the *at() thing strikes again. Apparently. -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
