hi,

>> can you please add comments on each uvm_fault_* functions you introduced?
>> eg. what "uvm_fault_lower1" does is not clear from its name at all.
>> to me, it isn't clear what was the purpose of the mechanical splitting of
>> these functions.
> 
> I will clean up things & put asserts & comments after merge.  Give me
> one week...

merge of what?  your xip branch?
it's better to do it before the merge if you want people review it.

YAMAMOTO Takashi

> 
> Masao

Reply via email to