> > Log Message: > > uvm_fault: Pack variables shared during fault / re-fault into a struct named > > uvm_faultctx. Unfortunately ~all of those values are overriden in various > > ways. Constification doesn't help much... > > Isn't that what uvm_faultinfo is for? Why are you inventing a new structure?
I thought uvm_faultinfo was there for uvmfault_lookup() and other various functions to omit arguments. It's a public structure. My intent is to consolidate variables (state) kept in one fault, especially across re-faults. Those state is internal to uvm_fault. Exposing the internal seems odd to me. (But yes, the name is confusing.) Masao
