On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 08:09:44AM +0000, David Laight wrote: > > gcc does not seem to be very deterministic about this kind of thing. > > I've being trying to stop gcc using too many registers in another > project - with 24 available registers you'd think it would manage > not to spill locals to the stack! But no, the 'status function' > (which just copies info into a big buffer with a few local actions) > managed to generate temporaries all of its own! In this case marking > the target buffer 'volatile' helped no end!
That starts to sound like "bug" :-/ -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
