> this seems pretty gross. i'm not sure it's a good way to > solve the problem at hand. it hides everything away with > @. it also doesn't appear to avoid updating a file if it > hasn't actually changed. it also hard codes /tmp, which > it shouldn't need to use at all. it also uses "cp" > instead of "mv".
Could you give me a test case this fails? I'm all for better solution. Masao -- Masao Uebayashi / Tombi Inc. / Tel: +81-90-9141-4635
