In article <20091025170934.bd83c17...@cvs.netbsd.org>, David Laight <source-changes-d@NetBSD.org> wrote: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >Module Name: src >Committed By: dsl >Date: Sun Oct 25 17:09:34 UTC 2009 > >Modified Files: > src/lib/libc/stdio: asprintf.c fgets.c fgetwc.c fread.c fvwrite.c > getdelim.c > >Log Message: >Lint is differentially far too picky... >Remove some warnings that only appear on i386 (not on amd64) and that >for some reason best known to others are deemed fatal for i386. >Making this code 'pass lint' does absolutely nothing for its readability (etc).
Can we just revert the past 2 commits? Changing: (size_t)x -> x + 0u does not look like an improvement to me. At least the first shows the intent, the second is just confusing, specially when size_t is unsigned long. christos
