On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 06:09:00PM +0200, Adam Hamsik wrote:
> Sorry I haven't read this thread until today. I think that it would be  
> good to test my vreclaim patched kernel it might help to resolve your  
> problem. But I don't think it is a solution see above.

Your patch won't help. It only changes the behavior or getnewvnode(),
and in this problem getnewvnode() isn't involved at all.
Also I can't see how your patch would help, a vnode for an inode which has
been deleted still needs to be invalidated at unlink time, and can't
be deffered to another thread.

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bou...@antioche.eu.org>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--

Reply via email to