On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:44:34PM +0100, Matthias Scheler wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:17:25AM +0000, Michael Shalayeff wrote: > > pfsync never collided w/ anything. it used "unassigned" proto number. > > Does it still do that?
of course. adding extra udp encapsualtion only kills performance.
cu
--
paranoic mickey (my employers have changed but, the name has remained)
