On Sat, 16 May 2009, Andrew Doran wrote: > Thanks! How about this to avoid potential sign compare issues? I forgot > to e-mail you about it earlier. > > @@ -252,8 +252,8 @@ typedef struct vnode vnode_t; > /* > * v_usecount; see the comment in vfs_subr.c > */ > -#define VC_XLOCK 0x80000000 > -#define VC_MASK 0x7fffffff > +#define VC_XLOCK 0x40000000 > +#define VC_MASK (0xffffffff & ~VC_XLOCK)
It may be easier and safer to use 0x7fffffffUL. --apb (Alan Barrett)
