Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote: >On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 14:18:16 +0000, Christoph Egger wrote:
>> struct device * -> device_t, no functional changes intended. >Why don't you cmp(1) the objects before and after to verify that? >"Same object code generated" is, unlike intentions, something that can >be verified. A fair number won't be the same, I would guess half our SCSI drivers are currently broken. Do a search in sys/dev/ic for 'adapt_dev', any driver that casts this to a softc instead of calling device_private() will crash. Robert Swindells
