On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 08:22:27PM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote: > In article <20090413195657.ge28...@hairylemon.org>, > Andrew Doran <a...@netbsd.org> wrote: > >On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 06:40:56PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote: > > > >> Modified Files: > >> src/external/bsd/bind/include/isc: platform.h > >> > >> Log Message: > >> auto-define if we have 64 bit atomic ops. > > > >- It's __HAVE_ATOMIC64_OPS, not __HAVE_ATOMIC64_OP. > > thanks > > >- It's not true for the i486 in userspcae. > > So what is one supposed to do for the i486?
Like the below maybe? I don't have time to compile test it right now. I'll put it on my list if you don't get to it. Index: types.h =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/src/sys/arch/i386/include/types.h,v retrieving revision 1.64 diff -u -r1.64 types.h --- types.h 5 Apr 2009 00:57:56 -0000 1.64 +++ types.h 13 Apr 2009 20:25:07 -0000 @@ -81,11 +81,11 @@ #define __HAVE_SYSCALL_INTERN #define __HAVE_MINIMAL_EMUL #define __HAVE_OLD_DISKLABEL -#define __HAVE_ATOMIC64_OPS #define __HAVE_ATOMIC_AS_MEMBAR #define __HAVE_CPU_LWP_SETPRIVATE #if defined(_KERNEL) +#define __HAVE_ATOMIC64_OPS /* not true for i486 in userspace */ #define __HAVE_RAS #endif
