> On Mar 23, 12:52am, y...@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote: > -- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/fs/ptyfs > > | hi, > | > | > Module Name: src > | > Committed By: christos > | > Date: Sun Mar 15 16:43:55 UTC 2009 > | > > | > Modified Files: > | > src/sys/fs/ptyfs: ptyfs.h ptyfs_vfsops.c > | > > | > Log Message: > | > Add a chroot flag, so that ptyfs can be mounted in a chrooted environment. > | > XXX: This is a hack, in reality we should allow multiple ptyfs mounts. > | > | why does this need to be a mount flag? > | > | YAMAMOTO Takashi > > How else you could select either behavior?
probably i'm missing something obvious. i don't understand why you need to have two different behaviours. the chroot one can't work for the non-chroot case? YAMAMOTO Takashi > > christos
