ahhh I see..good point..yes, for a high number of unique scores the secondary sort won't have any effect..
On 30 November 2010 09:32, Jason Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi - you do understand may case - we tried what you suggested but as the > relevancy is very precise we couldn't get it it to do a dual-sort. > > I like the idea of using one of the dismax parameters (bf) to in-effect > increase the boost on a newer document. > > Thanks for all replies, most useful. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Savvas-Andreas Moysidis [mailto: > [email protected]] > Sent: Tue 30/11/2010 09:26 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Boost on newer documents > > hi, > > I might not understand your case right but can you not add an extra > publishedDate field and then specify a secondary (after relevance) sort by > that? > > On 30 November 2010 08:05, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > You could also put a short representation of the data (I suggest days > since > > 01.01.2010) as payload and calculate boost with payload function of the > > similarity. > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: ext Jason Brown [mailto:[email protected]] > > >Sent: Montag, 29. November 2010 17:28 > > >To: [email protected] > > >Subject: Boost on newer documents > > > > > > > > >Hi, > > > > > >I use the dismax query to search across several fields. > > > > > >I find I have a lot of documents with the same document name (one of the > > fields that the dismax queries) so I wanted to adjust the > > >relevance so that titles with a newer published date have a higher > > relevance than documents with the same title but are older. Does > > >anyone know how I can achieve this? > > > > > >Thank You > > > > > >Jason. > > > > > >If you wish to view the St. James's Place email disclaimer, please use > the > > link below > > > > > >http://www.sjp.co.uk/portal/internet/SJPemaildisclaimer > > > > > If you wish to view the St. James's Place email disclaimer, please use the > link below > > http://www.sjp.co.uk/portal/internet/SJPemaildisclaimer >
