Thanks for the suggestion, Is there any way to get the info which operation or which query params are increasing the response time.
On Sat, 18 Jan, 2020, 11:59 PM Dave, <hastings.recurs...@gmail.com> wrote: > If you’re not getting values, don’t ask for the facet. Facets are > expensive as hell, maybe you should think more about your query’s than your > infrastructure, solr cloud won’t help you at all especially if your asking > for things you don’t need > > > On Jan 18, 2020, at 1:25 PM, Rajdeep Sahoo <rajdeepsahoo2...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > We have assigned 16 gb out of 24gb for heap . > > No other process is running on that node. > > > > 200 facets fields are there in the query but we will not be getting the > > values for each facets for every search. > > There can be max of 50-60 facets for which we will be getting values. > > > > We are using caching,is it not going to help. > > > > > > > >> On Sat, 18 Jan, 2020, 11:36 PM Shawn Heisey, <apa...@elyograg.org> > wrote: > >> > >>> On 1/18/2020 10:09 AM, Rajdeep Sahoo wrote: > >>> We are having 2.3 million documents and size is 2.5 gb. > >>> 10 core cpu and 24 gb ram . 16 slave nodes. > >>> > >>> Still some of the queries are taking 50 sec at solr end. > >>> As we are using solr 4.6 . > >>> Other thing is we are having 200 (avg) facet fields in a query. > >>> And 30 searchable fields. > >>> Is there any way to identify why it is taking 50 sec for a query. > >>> Multiple concurrent requests are there. > >> > >> Searching 30 fields and computing 200 facets is never going to be super > >> fast. Switching to cloud will not help, and might make it slower. > >> > >> Your index is pretty small to a lot of us. There are people running > >> indexes with billions of documents that take terabytes of disk space. > >> > >> As Walter mentioned, computing 200 facets is going to require a fair > >> amount of heap memory. One *possible* problem here is that the Solr > >> heap size is too small, so a lot of GC is required. How much of the > >> 24GB have you assigned to the heap? Is there any software other than > >> Solr running on these nodes? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Shawn > >> >