-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Rick,

On 3/6/18 6:39 PM, Rick Leir wrote:
> The first thing that came to mind is that you are planning not to 
> have an app in front of Solr. Without a web app, you will need to 
> trust whoever can get access to Solr. Maybe you are on an
> intranet.
Nope, we have a web application between the user and Solr. But I would
rather not parse the user's query string and re-write it so that the
search field-names are canonicalized.

Thanks,
- -chris

> On March 6, 2018 2:42:26 AM EST, "Emir Arnautović"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi, I did not try it, but the first thing that came to my mind is
>> to use edismax’s ability to define field aliases, something like 
>> f.f1.fq=field_1. Note that it is not recommended to have field
>> name starting with number so not sure if it will work with “1”.
>> 
>> HTH, Emir -- Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly
>> Detection Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training -
>> http://sematext.com/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 5 Mar 2018, at 17:51, Christopher Schultz
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
> All,
> 
> I'd like for users to be able to search a field by multiple names 
> without performing a "copy-field" when analyzing a document. Is
> that possible? Whenever I search for "solr alias field" I get
> results
>>> about
> how to re-name fields in the results.
> 
> Here's what I'd like to do. Let's say I have a document:
> 
> { id: 1234, field_1: valueA, field_2: valueB, field_3: valueC }
> 
> I'd like users to be able to find this document using any of the 
> following queries:
> 
> field_1:valueA f1:valueA 1:valueA
> 
> I just want the query parser to say "oh, 'f1' is an alias for 
> 'field_1'" and substitute that when performing the search. Is that 
> possible?
> 
> -chris
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=x/55
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to