I think the upshot was that we love the social posts and mission of TAFI, and probably need to stick to this thread for proposing them.
Jeff Elder Digital communications manager Wikimedia Foundation 704-650-4130 @jeffelder <https://twitter.com/JeffElder> @wikipedia <https://twitter.com/wikipedia> The Wikimedia blog <https://blog.wikimedia.org/> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Coin945 <[email protected]> wrote: > Just wondering... what are your opinions on moving forward with this TAFI > proposal? It's been 3 days since my last reply. :) > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Coin945 <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> This discussion thread is very confusing to navitage, but I think I've >> read it all now (albeit out of order). >> >> To answer Jeff's question: yes, the links are supposed to link to the >> Wikipedia pages, not the Wikimedia pages (which are understandably >> redlinks). >> >> One of the two main purposes of TAFI is to encourage newbies to become >> editors through interesting articles on important topics that still >> shockingly have underwhelming articles; this challenges the perceived >> notion that "all the good topics have already been written about". >> >> This social media collaboration was fantastic in intriguing people >> throguh witty and engaging statuses that aimed to encourage passers-by to >> stop, consider, and then perhaps gfo to the link and hit "edit". >> >> We had great success with this in the past, and I would love to get >> things rolling again. This is part of a recent push I've been doing, which >> includes starting up the discussion of whether TAFI could ever return to >> the main page. >> >> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 4:44 AM, Tilman Bayer <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Jeff (switching topic back to the thread about TAFI), >>> >>> Coin945 (who posted these suggestions) is now subscribed to this list >>> and can thus answer your question directly. But I think the matter was >>> simply that the drafts had been copied over from Wikipedia to Meta >>> without adjusting links, e.g. the first one was intended to link to >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comedy_horror instead of >>> >>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Comedy_horror&action=edit&redlink=1 >>> . >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Jeff Elder <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > Excellent point, Joe. >>> > Question: I went to the links posted on the meta wiki as suggestions >>> for >>> > tweets for articles to be improved, but the links take you to a page >>> asking >>> > you to create said article. Would that be strange, asking people to >>> improve >>> > an article that doesn't exist yet? Or am I seeing this wrong? I thought >>> > these tweets were to encourage people who were just getting their feet >>> wet >>> > editing. >>> > >>> > Jeff Elder >>> > Digital communications manager >>> > Wikimedia Foundation >>> > 704-650-4130 >>> > @jeffelder >>> > @wikipedia >>> > The Wikimedia blog >>> > >>> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Joe Sutherland < >>> [email protected]> >>> > wrote: >>> >> >>> >> I'm not sure it's a great idea to post this to our socials. Seems to >>> me >>> >> like we'd be opening the list (which is public) to a lot of spam. But >>> maybe >>> >> I'm just being too cautious. >>> >> >>> >> Joe >>> >> >>> >> On 26 October 2015 at 15:48, Jeff Elder <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, Tilman for the background! I like the idea of posting about >>> >>> articles that need attention. Let's do it! >>> >>> >>> >>> There does seem to be some overlap between this list and the meta >>> wiki, >>> >>> as Ed noted in the thread Tilman shared: >>> >>> >>> >>> because few people besides Matthew and myself were checking >>> >>> their Meta watchlist often enough, this mailing list proved to be a >>> >>> much more reliable venue for people to post SM ideas for review and >>> >>> get a timely response. >>> >>> >>> >>> My take is that people can still use the meta wiki and I'm happy to >>> swing >>> >>> by it, but we may need to send stuff around this list anyway for a >>> LGTM and >>> >>> to do a little air-traffic controlling to prevent conflicts and >>> traffic >>> >>> jams. >>> >>> >>> >>> Should we tell people on Twitter and Facebook that they can >>> subscribe to >>> >>> this list? If so, should we say: >>> >>> >>> >>> T: >>> >>> Want to give input on what and how we tweet? Sign up for our social >>> media >>> >>> email list here: >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>> >>> >>> >>> FB: >>> >>> Want to give input on what and how we post on Facebook? You can give >>> >>> feedback here, or take part by signing up for our social media email >>> list >>> >>> here: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Jeff Elder >>> >>> Digital communications manager >>> >>> Wikimedia Foundation >>> >>> 704-650-4130 >>> >>> @jeffelder >>> >>> @wikipedia >>> >>> The Wikimedia blog >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Tilman Bayer <[email protected]> >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> (splitting this off into a new thread, as it's a separate topic from >>> >>>> TAFI) >>> >>>> >>> >>>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Andrew Sherman < >>> [email protected]> >>> >>>> wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> I remember Ed, Joe, Michael, and I sat down to clean that page up >>> back >>> >>>>> in July (archive old information, add useful links for content). >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> I have thought about the idea of utilizing this page more. We could >>> >>>>> asking for social content from the whole movement like we do for >>> blog posts >>> >>>>> ( maybe even translations ;) ). >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Of course we are already asking for (and getting) social content >>> from >>> >>>> the whole movement with this list. See also the list description at >>> >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media . That >>> said, some >>> >>>> community members might prefer posting on a wiki. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> As a reminder, in August there was already some discussion about >>> >>>> reviving the Meta page (in the same thread); here is my takeaway >>> from that >>> >>>> on why the parallel wiki/mailing list process didn't quite work out >>> back in >>> >>>> 2013/14 and what might be required to make it work: >>> >>>> >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/social-media/2015-August/003211.html >>> >>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> It could help with organization and preparation of content. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Thoughts? >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Tilman Bayer < >>> [email protected]> >>> >>>>> wrote: >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> Hi, >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> as I summarized two months ago on this list in another context, >>> back >>> >>>>>> in 2013/14 we collaborated with the "Today's Article for >>> Improvement" team >>> >>>>>> on the English Wikipedia, posting social media invitations to >>> edit improve >>> >>>>>> articles from this community-curated list. >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> User:Coin945 has just started an attempt to revive this (see >>> >>>>>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Today%27s_articles_for_improvement#Social_media_blurbs >>> >>>>>> ) and already posted some ideas at >>> >>>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Social_media/Calendar#October . >>> I'm passing >>> >>>>>> this on to this list as not everyone might watch the Meta-wiki >>> pages. As >>> >>>>>> mentioned earlier, the experiment back them left me wondering how >>> to best >>> >>>>>> achieve impact (in form of actual edits caused by those posts), >>> but perhaps >>> >>>>>> the current SM team has some new ideas. >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> -- >>> >>>>>> Tilman Bayer >>> >>>>>> Senior Analyst >>> >>>>>> Wikimedia Foundation >>> >>>>>> IRC (Freenode): HaeB >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>>>>> Social-media mailing list >>> >>>>>> [email protected] >>> >>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>> >>>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> -- >>> >>>>> Andrew Sherman >>> >>>>> Digital Communications | Wikimedia Foundation >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> E: [email protected] >>> >>>>> WMF: ASherman (WMF) >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>>>> Social-media mailing list >>> >>>>> [email protected] >>> >>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> -- >>> >>>> Tilman Bayer >>> >>>> Senior Analyst >>> >>>> Wikimedia Foundation >>> >>>> IRC (Freenode): HaeB >>> >>>> >>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>>> Social-media mailing list >>> >>>> [email protected] >>> >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> Social-media mailing list >>> >>> [email protected] >>> >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> Joe Sutherland >>> >> Communications Intern [remote] >>> >> m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu | w: JSutherland >>> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> Social-media mailing list >>> >> [email protected] >>> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Social-media mailing list >>> > [email protected] >>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Tilman Bayer >>> Senior Analyst >>> Wikimedia Foundation >>> IRC (Freenode): HaeB >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Social-media mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Social-media mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > >
_______________________________________________ Social-media mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
