We shared: FB: https://www.facebook.com/33138223345/posts/10153550229073346?_rdr=p
@Wikipedia: https://twitter.com/Wikipedia/status/646331631557574656 @Wikimedia: https://twitter.com/Wikimedia/status/646331673475481600 WP G+: https://plus.google.com/+Wikipedia/posts/b3BjD3gpnAj WMF G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/108193079736330787108/108193079736330787108/posts/WPbVhKZYEkK On 22 September 2015 at 02:00, Joe Sutherland <[email protected]> wrote: > I'll get them scheduled. > > Joe > > On 22 September 2015 at 01:59, Ed Erhart <[email protected]> wrote: > >> That was exactly the perspective I was looking for! Given that it's good >> practice, can we get those posts scheduled for tomorrow? >> >> --Ed >> >> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Michael Guss <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Ed, that is perfectly fine and is really a staple for >>> "attention-grabbing" while simultaneously using the title of the blog post >>> within the Facebook preview as complementary copy. I speak more from a >>> social media/ marketing perspective, of course. >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Ed Erhart <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> We could probably just go with "Read this editor's advice first," as >>>> the previewed title will contain the rest, but I'm not sure if that's best >>>> practice for Facebook. Michael, Joe, your thoughts? >>>> >>>> --Ed >>>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Juliet Barbara <[email protected] >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ok, for FB what about: >>>>> >>>>> Thinking about paying for a Wikipedia article? Read this editor's >>>>> advice first. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Ed Erhart <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> @Juliet, that's already in the title of the article which appears as >>>>>> a preview on Facebook. That works great for Twitter, though. >>>>>> >>>>>> --Ed >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Gregory Varnum < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I like that for FB and Twitter. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -greg >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________ >>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone - a more detailed response may be sent later. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sep 21, 2015, at 3:20 PM, Juliet Barbara <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How about something straightforward like: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Should you pay for a Wikipedia article? Find out here. [LINK] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Ed Erhart <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This is now published after a snafu with WordPress' scheduling >>>>>>>> mechanism. Further proposed Facebook posts: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - "Wikipedia is, after all, an encyclopedia—not a commercial >>>>>>>> directory." >>>>>>>> - No, you should not hire a paid editor who does not disclose >>>>>>>> that fact on Wikipedia. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --Ed >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Pine W <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I guess a further refinement: it can be free of financial >>>>>>>>> obligation in order to participate in Wikipedia in many ways, but >>>>>>>>> plenty of >>>>>>>>> people and organizations are being paid for their involvement, so we >>>>>>>>> need >>>>>>>>> to be careful about the messaging. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Pine >>>>>>>>> On Sep 19, 2015 1:38 PM, "Pine W" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Agreed that we should drop any suggestions that everyone who >>>>>>>>>> creates content or does other work is doing so for free. Wikipedia >>>>>>>>>> is free >>>>>>>>>> (of financial obligation) as in free to read and share, not as in >>>>>>>>>> free to >>>>>>>>>> create, store, maintain, defend, reseaech, and develop. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Pine >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Ed Erhart >>>>>>>> Editorial Associate >>>>>>>> Wikimedia Foundation >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> *Juliet Barbara* >>>>>>> Senior Communications Manager I Wikimedia Foundation >>>>>>> 149 New Montgomery Street I San Francisco, CA 94105 >>>>>>> [email protected] I +1 (512) 750-5677 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Social-media mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Ed Erhart >>>>>> Editorial Associate >>>>>> Wikimedia Foundation >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> *Juliet Barbara* >>>>> Senior Communications Manager I Wikimedia Foundation >>>>> 149 New Montgomery Street I San Francisco, CA 94105 >>>>> [email protected] I +1 (512) 750-5677 >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ed Erhart >>>> Editorial Associate >>>> Wikimedia Foundation >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Michael Guss >>> Research Analyst >>> Wikimediafoundation.org >>> [email protected] >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Ed Erhart >> Editorial Associate >> Wikimedia Foundation >> > > > > -- > *Joe Sutherland* > Communications Intern [remote] > m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w: > JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)> > -- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w: JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)>
_______________________________________________ Social-media mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
