We've shared: FB: https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153467758388346
@Wikipedia: https://twitter.com/Wikipedia/status/633750252630114305 @Wikimedia: https://twitter.com/Wikimedia/status/633750252646891520 WP G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/100123345029543043288/+Wikipedia/posts/DZ5s2rKYGYg WMF G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/108193079736330787108/108193079736330787108/posts/HS4GHYDnNEV On 18 August 2015 at 22:17, Joe Sutherland <[email protected]> wrote: > Will get this out now. We can resocialise this tomorrow for more eyeballs. > > Joe > > On 18 August 2015 at 22:17, Juliet Barbara <[email protected]> wrote: > >> How about we incorporate the headline. Can we do: >> >> Citation needed: despite headlines, frequent edits don’t cause inaccuracy >> >> >> On Tuesday, August 18, 2015, Tilman Bayer <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Joe Sutherland >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > Hey all, >>> > >>> > We just published "Despite headlines, frequent edits don’t cause >>> inaccuracy" >>> > to the blog. URL: >>> > >>> > https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/18/controversy-and-edit-rates/ >>> > >>> > Many thanks to everyone involved for this post. >>> > >>> > Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed. >>> > >>> > Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia): >>> > • Citation needed: study finds edit rates correlate with controversy, >>> not >>> > reliability >>> > https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/18/controversy-and-edit-rates/ >>> Citation needed: study finds edit rates correlate with controversy, not >>> > reliability >>> Well to be precise, the study did not actually find that edit rates do >>> not correlate with controversy... How about: >>> >>> Citation needed: Study finds controversies relate to higher edit rates >>> - but does that really damage reliability? >>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/18/controversy-and-edit-rates/ >>> >>> As an alternative or double-down tweet, I think the post's title >>> actually works well as tweet too: >>> >>> Despite headlines, frequent edits don’t cause inaccuracy >>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/18/controversy-and-edit-rates/ >>> >>> >>> > >>> > Facebook/Google+: >>> > • "In true Wikipedian spirit, we believe any research should be >>> assessed and >>> > reported with rigor and care." >>> > https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/18/controversy-and-edit-rates/ >>> LGTM >>> > >>> > thanks, >>> > Joe >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Joe Sutherland >>> > Communications Intern [remote] >>> > m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu | w: JSutherland >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Social-media mailing list >>> > [email protected] >>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Tilman Bayer >>> Senior Analyst >>> Wikimedia Foundation >>> IRC (Freenode): HaeB >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Social-media mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >>> >> >> >> -- >> *Juliet Barbara* >> Senior Communications Manager I Wikimedia Foundation >> 149 New Montgomery Street I San Francisco, CA 94105 >> [email protected] I +1 (512) 750-5677 >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Social-media mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >> >> > > > -- > *Joe Sutherland* > Communications Intern [remote] > m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w: > JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)> > -- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w: JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)>
_______________________________________________ Social-media mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
