Why not multiple tweets, one of which has the mentions? We don't send out enough tweets anyway IMHO, and it's a good way to personally yet publicly acknowledge them.
--Ed On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:39 PM, James Alexander <[email protected]> wrote: > Article looks good, while I watched it from home (it was one of those days > sadly) I loved how the speakers actually had wildly different views at > times which has not always been the case for these events (which is not > required :) I enjoyed those too ). SM Comments inline > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Yana Welinder <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Looks great! Do we want to include the speakers' twitter handles so that >> they retweet it to their followers? If so, here they are: @PamelaSamuelson >> @LilaBaileyLaw @dreamword @melvingibbs @yanatweets >> >> Feel free to leave me out if you run out of characters. I'll retweet it >> regardless. :) >> >> > Hmm, I give some options below (even without mentioning you it's too long > without adjustment) but I'd actually stay away from mentions given how many > there are. I just think the tweet itself starts to become so cluttered it's > hard to use and understand for the average reader. That would end up with > 5-6 different links in the tweet which is pretty rough. > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Joe Sutherland <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hey all, >>> >>> We just published "Wikimedia Foundation hosts lively panel on copyright" >>> to the blog. URL: >>> >>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ >>> >>> Many thanks to Lexie, Yana and Michelle for this post. >>> >>> Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed. >>> >>> *Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* >>> • Wikimedia Foundation Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. >>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ >>> >>> • Wikimedia hosts copyright experts debating recent mass digitization >>> policy proposal. >>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ >>> >> > > - Both LGTM, personally I'd avoid mentions (picking just 1 or 2 to > mention isn't fair and all 4-5 makes it very cluttered) and go with the 2nd > one but I'm happy with both :). If we want to do the mentions then we'd > probably have to take #1 and adjust it for length. Some options below. > - Wikimedia Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. @ > PamelaSamuelson <https://twitter.com/PamelaSamuelson> @LilaBaileyLaw > <https://twitter.com/LilaBaileyLaw> @dreamword > <https://twitter.com/dreamword> @melvingibbs > <https://twitter.com/melvingibbs> > https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ [6char > left] > - WMF Legal event draws 100+ to discuss copyright. @PamelaSamuelson > <https://twitter.com/PamelaSamuelson> @LilaBaileyLaw > <https://twitter.com/LilaBaileyLaw> @dreamword > <https://twitter.com/dreamword> @melvingibbs > <https://twitter.com/melvingibbs> @yanatweets > <https://twitter.com/yanatweets> > https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ [0 > left] > > >>> >>> *Facebook/Google+:* >>> • The Wikimedia Foundation hosts leading voices on copyright for a >>> lively panel on mass digitization. >>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/08/03/wikimedia-copyright-panel/ >>> >>> thanks, >>> Joe >>> >>> -- >>> *Joe Sutherland* >>> Communications Intern [remote] >>> m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w: >>> JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)> >>> >> > FB/G+ LGTM > > _______________________________________________ > Social-media mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > > -- Ed Erhart Editorial Intern Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________ Social-media mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
