Shared round 3: Bad-boy bishop.

FB: https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153423292008346

@Wikipedia: https://twitter.com/Wikipedia/status/627228607144980480
@wikimedia: https://twitter.com/Wikimedia/status/627228607249784832

WP G+:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/100123345029543043288/+Wikipedia/posts/G4LhHG3yKkP
WMF G+:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/108193079736330787108/108193079736330787108/posts/PMDsBopckCv

On 29 July 2015 at 17:38, Joe Sutherland <[email protected]> wrote:

> Put out round two, van Meegeren's forgeries.
>
> FB: https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153417917973346
>
> @Wikipedia: https://twitter.com/Wikipedia/status/626431107270070272
> @Wikimedia: https://twitter.com/Wikimedia/status/626431107207139328
>
> WP G+:
> https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/100123345029543043288/+Wikipedia/posts/1Zw81xYiuTF
> WMF G+:
> https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/108193079736330787108/108193079736330787108/posts/Nk3mBSGAnqQ
>
> On 28 July 2015 at 19:40, Michael Guss <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Round 1: Tulips be costly
>>
>> Wikimedia G+ :
>> https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/108193079736330787108/108193079736330787108/posts/Dj2TLghvwM5
>>
>> Wikipedia G+ :
>> https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/108193079736330787108/+Wikipedia/posts/eXy5p4D8URp
>>
>>
>> Fb: https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153415955338346
>>
>> @wikipedia: https://twitter.com/Wikipedia/status/626095437225816065
>>
>> @wikimedia: https://twitter.com/Wikimedia/status/626095437221621761
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Michael Guss <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> FYI this is a great feature we have now and I am so glad we have these.
>>>
>>> Just 1 commentary:
>>>
>>> • That one time when they paid thousands ... for a single tulip bulb.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Ed Erhart <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We can always post both of them over the course of the coming week and
>>>> see which one does better. ;-) Thanks, James!
>>>>
>>>> --Ed
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 5:02 PM, James Alexander <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Great read, I need to go through the articles themselves later! SM
>>>>> comments in line
>>>>>
>>>>> James Alexander
>>>>> Community Advocacy
>>>>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>>>> (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Joe Sutherland <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We just published "Wikipedia Picks: a ‘bad-boy’ bishop and expensive
>>>>>> tulips" to the blog. URL:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/07/27/bad-bishop-and-expensive-tulips/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Many thanks to Ed and Victoria for this post.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):*
>>>>>> • "This is the epitome of a bad-boy bishop."
>>>>>> • Monroe Edwards was a modern-day Catch Me If You Can, albeit much
>>>>>> less successful.
>>>>>> • Han van Meegeren once sold a forged painting to a Nazi high
>>>>>> official.
>>>>>> • That time when they paid thousands for a single tulip bulb.
>>>>>> • How much would you pay for a tulip bulb?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I think these are all fine to post, my favorite is the last 2 about
>>>>> the Tulip and a couple suggestion (in addition not as adjustments) below
>>>>> (obviously biased about my own):
>>>>>
>>>>>    - Han van Meegeren's forgeries became collectables themselves [I
>>>>>    love this part, think it has a bit more 'pop' then just that he sold 
>>>>> them
>>>>>    to the Nazi's.
>>>>>
>>>>> *Facebook/Google+:*
>>>>>> • "This is the epitome of a bad-boy bishop."
>>>>>> • Monroe Edwards was a modern-day Catch Me If You Can, albeit much
>>>>>> less successful.
>>>>>> • Han van Meegeren once sold a forged painting to a Nazi high
>>>>>> official.
>>>>>> • That time when they paid thousands for a single tulip bulb.
>>>>>> • How much would you pay for a tulip bulb?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>> Joe
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Same, LGTM and I'd add the one above as an option.
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Social-media mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ed Erhart
>>>> Editorial Intern
>>>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Social-media mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael Guss
>>> Research Analyst
>>> Wikimediafoundation.org
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Michael Guss
>> Research Analyst
>> Wikimediafoundation.org
>> [email protected]
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Social-media mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Joe Sutherland*
> Communications Intern [remote]
> m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w:
> JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)>
>



-- 
*Joe Sutherland*
Communications Intern [remote]
m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w:
JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)>
_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media

Reply via email to