It'd certainly help make the blog more prevalent in community circles.

--Ed

On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 8:36 PM, James Alexander <[email protected]>
wrote:

> oh for an openID provider on SUL........
>
> James Alexander
> Community Advocacy
> Wikimedia Foundation
> (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Ed Erhart <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I'm not advocating for open commenting! That would be a lot of extra work
>> for all of us. Social media is easy, but many community members won't
>> comment because they don't use their real names on-wiki.
>>
>> --Ed
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Joe Sutherland <[email protected]
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 6 July 2015 at 14:00, Ed Erhart <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Are we still planning to resocialize this story? We've still only had
>>>> the two posts (one each for Twitter/Facebook).
>>>>
>>>> I believe that we're tracking likes and shares now, Alex, but it's hard
>>>> to gauge *community *participation. The Signpost, for instance, gets
>>>> plenty of comments because it's on-wiki and everyone has an account there.
>>>> Perhaps the requirement for a WordPress account is too high a bar?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Spam is a real issue with stuff like this, and I think social media
>>> allows for easy enough commenting?
>>>
>>> Joe
>>>
>>>
>>>> --Ed
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Alex Stinson <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Glad to see the post shared! Love it!
>>>>>
>>>>> It occurs to me as someone who has written several blog posts, and
>>>>> supported several others: I am always dis-appointed a bit on the number of
>>>>> comments on the blog post itself: but it seems that a lot of the
>>>>> commenting/visibility will happen elsewhere. Is there a way to surface 
>>>>> both
>>>>> page views on the blog alongside number of likes/retweets, etc. I think it
>>>>> would be great to get a sense of scale for community participation in
>>>>> reading/hearing the stories on the platform itself (and maybe provide a
>>>>> different incentive structure/invitation for participating in the blog, by
>>>>> marking shares/retweets, etc as valid responses to the post).
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Alex Stinson
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Michael Guss <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Furthermore, we'll be consistently resharing stories from now on.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Michael Guss <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Good morning,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The following has been shared:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fb: https://www.facebook.com/wikipedia/posts/10153356481158346
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @wikipedia: https://twitter.com/Wikipedia/status/616285297991655425
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @wikimedia: https://twitter.com/Wikimedia/status/616285818139856896
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wikipedia G+ :
>>>>>>> https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/100123345029543043288/+Wikipedia/posts/FBpBEVGvrXi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wikimedia G+ :
>>>>>>> https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/108193079736330787108/108193079736330787108/posts/EF7fri18gDD
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Ed Erhart <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sometime, Michael, you're going to have to miss a beat ... ... but
>>>>>>>> it will not be this day. :-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you very much!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --Ed
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Michael Guss <[email protected]
>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Ed,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have already scheduled these for tomorrow morning to meet the
>>>>>>>>> most traffic.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, June 30, 2015, Ed Erhart <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> James- agreed. At the least, we need to push out two or more for
>>>>>>>>>> Twitter—I think it's an underutilized resource.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> @Michael, can you post some of these tomorrow? Joe will be on a
>>>>>>>>>> plane over the Atlantic Ocean.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --Ed
>>>>>>>>>> ​
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Michael Guss
>>>>>>>>> Research Analyst
>>>>>>>>> Wikimediafoundation.org
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Ed Erhart
>>>>>>>> Editorial Intern
>>>>>>>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Michael Guss
>>>>>>> Research Analyst
>>>>>>> Wikimediafoundation.org
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Michael Guss
>>>>>> Research Analyst
>>>>>> Wikimediafoundation.org
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ed Erhart
>>>> Editorial Intern
>>>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Social-media mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Joe Sutherland*
>>> Communications Intern [remote]
>>> m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w:
>>> JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Social-media mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ed Erhart
>> Editorial Intern
>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Social-media mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Social-media mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
>
>


-- 
Ed Erhart
Editorial Intern
Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media

Reply via email to