that WFM, the other draft in my head was essentially that. Yeah, I like the idea of doing a couple of them, For Twitter my other favorites are #1 and #2. For F/G I'm generally happy with them all (but like sneaking in the 1 person 1 article bit)
James Alexander Community Advocacy Wikimedia Foundation (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Ed Erhart <[email protected]> wrote: > I proposed a good deal of these because I'd like to start socializing our > articles more than once each (as discussed in our Monday meeting)—more so > for the picks and news, but at least twice here. > > On the Twitter suggestion, how about this? 80 hours finding sources, who > knows how long reading them, and 300 hours writing: one person, one > article. > https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/06/30/improving-wikipedia-texas-revolution/ > > --Ed > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:14 PM, James Alexander <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> >> >> James Alexander >> Community Advocacy >> Wikimedia Foundation >> (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur >> >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Joe Sutherland < >> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/06/30/improving-wikipedia-texas-revolution/ >>> >>> >>> *Twitter (@wikimedia/@wikipedia):* >>> >>> • This #Wikipedia editor devoted hundreds of hours to one article. >>> • Two women are taking the lead on improving #Wikipedia's articles on >>> the #Texas Revolution. Here's one of them. >>> • Ever wonder why #Wikipedia's articles on the #Texas Revolution are so >>> good? >>> • 80 hours identifying sources, who knows how long reading them, and 300 >>> hours of writing. And that's just one person. >>> >>> >> I love the last one but would love to incorporate the 1 article piece >> too I think that resonates. How about: >> >> >> - 80 hours finding sources, who knows how long reading them, and 300 >> hours writing. And that's just 1 person 1 article >> >> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/06/30/improving-wikipedia-texas-revolution/ >> - Note: Removed the period at the end of the 2nd sentence... just to >> keep it in limit >> >> *Facebook/Google+:* >>> >>> • This #Wikipedia editor devoted hundreds of hours to one article. >>> • Ever wonder why #Wikipedia's articles on the #Texas Revolution are so >>> good? 80 hours identifying sources, an untold number of hours reading them, >>> and 300 hours of writing. That's just one of the people who worked on it. >>> • 80 hours identifying sources, an untold number of hours reading them, >>> and 300 hours of writing. And that's just one of the people who worked on >>> it. >>> >>> thanks, >>> Joe >>> >> >> I'm thinking #2 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Social-media mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >> >> > > > -- > Ed Erhart > Editorial Intern > Wikimedia Foundation > > _______________________________________________ > Social-media mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > >
_______________________________________________ Social-media mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
