All look good to me. Good shout on not touching the weird stats since yeah, it looks like a database issue (can't imagine that's a one-off either).
best, Joe On 3 June 2015 at 17:13, Michael Guss <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Tilman for taking care of these! I especially like the one on the > London tube. > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Tilman Bayer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From @wikimedia: >> https://twitter.com/bobbyshabangu/status/603137104885850112 >> >> From @wikipedia and @wikicommons: >> https://twitter.com/johnpmcdermott/status/605425957571338241 >> >> Also, for the record, on the suggestion of Ori I RTed >> https://twitter.com/soulislove/status/605086929042972672 (from >> @wikimedia and @mediawiki), to highlight the Foundation's web >> performance capacity buildup a bit. >> >> BTW, I don't think we should retweet phony stats like this from >> @wikipedia : >> https://twitter.com/WikipediaTrends/status/605765827351056384 >> (that number of > 22 million percent is almost certainly wrong, >> perhaps due to recent update lags of the pageview stats files that two >> other people complained about on the Analytics mailing list recently) >> -- >> Tilman Bayer >> Senior Analyst >> Wikimedia Foundation >> IRC (Freenode): HaeB >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Social-media mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media >> > > > > -- > Michael Guss > Research Analyst > Wikimediafoundation.org > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > Social-media mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media > > -- *Joe Sutherland* Communications Intern [remote] m: +44 (0) 7722 916 433 | t: @jrbsu <http://twitter.com/jrbsu> | w: JSutherland <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:JSutherland_(WMF)>
_______________________________________________ Social-media mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media
