*Hi all,*

*Here is the proposed SM for today's blog post regarding the new open
access license from the International Association of Scientific, Technical
& Medical Publishers. Thanks for reviewing:*

*Blog post:*
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2014/08/07/new-open-licenses-arent-so-open/

*SM calendar:*
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Social_media/Calendar#August_4-August_10

New “open” licenses aren’t so open

   - *t*: WMF joins 55 other open access groups in protesting “open”
   licenses that aren’t actually open:
   https://blog.wikimedia.org/2014/08/07/new-open-licenses-arent-so-open/


   - t: See why the WMF is against the latest licenses by the Association
   of Scientific, Technical & Medical Publishers:
   https://blog.wikimedia.org/2014/08/07/new-open-licenses-arent-so-open/


   - *t*: See why this new open access license fails to meet the standards
   set by the Freedom and Open Knowledge Definition:
   https://blog.wikimedia.org/2014/08/07/new-open-licenses-arent-so-open/


   - *f/g*: The new “open access” license by the International Association
   of Scientific Technical & Medical Publishers (STM) fails to meet the basic
   standards set out by the Freedom Definition and the Open Knowledge
   Definition. The Wikimedia Foundation joins the Public Library of Science,
   Open Knowledge and many other groups in urging STM to withdraw these
   licenses.
   https://blog.wikimedia.org/2014/08/07/new-open-licenses-arent-so-open/


-- 
Carlos Monterrey
Communications Associate
Wikimedia Foundation
+1.415.839.6885 ext 6881
www.wikimediafoundation.org
blog.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Social-media mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media

Reply via email to