----- Original Message ----- From: "Niclas Hedhman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 2:49 AM Subject: Re: Confusing issue on Maps
> On Tuesday 02 July 2002 13:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I will conclude by totally agreeing with your last paragraph -- the scope > > of application of SOAP is not clear to some. If one likes transparency at a > > distributed OO programming level use EJB/CORBA. > > There are "distributed concerns" that I have to live with, almost dictating > the use of SOAP over HTTP, or at least XXX over HTTP. > Firewalls!!! > > SOAP offered a nice middle ground. > > HOWEVER, calling it Simple OBJECT Access Protocol is to me a bit > overstatement, or I am missing something rudimentarily important (passing a > object reference) for that claim. I completely agree. I think anyone with illusions otherwise would lose them upon reading the Design Goals of the SOAP 1.1 spec (http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP/#_Toc478383487). The SOAP name was just too appealing to pass on, I guess. Scott Nichol > > Niclas > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
