Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
>
> Sam, in general I don't support the principle of becoming bug
> compatible.

Oh, joy.  A principles vs. pragmatism argument.

A plea for sanity here: my own personal belief is that the correct behavior
of code when receiving invalid input is undefined.  So, let me turn the
question around: why is the current behavior which produces not well formed
output preferred over one that does?

- Sam Ruby

Reply via email to