Ah, please don't worry then! Thanks for the report. We'll get this sorted out and get back to you.
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 7:41 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling < joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> wrote: > On 20/03/17 23:14, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote: > >> Most likely the snap was partly configured to run elsewhere, but not >> entirely. >> >> We really need to have someone looking into this package, preferably just >> restoring the standard /snap path. >> >> Can you rebuild the package and try that out? Would be a nice data point. >> If you can't or don't want to, that's okay. I'm sure the package >> maintainer >> will look into that. >> > > Well, I'm not an Arch user typically; I just installed it into a VM > (actually, my first ever Arch install) to check out whether snap packages > I've created would work. > > I can try to take a look, but I'm not sure I'll get there before the > maintainer does ;-) > > > -- > Snapcraft mailing list > Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailm > an/listinfo/snapcraft > -- gustavo @ http://niemeyer.net -- Snapcraft mailing list Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snapcraft