On 14 March 2017 at 12:21, John Lenton <john.len...@canonical.com> wrote:
> On 13 March 2017 at 21:05, Michael Hudson-Doyle > <michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote: > > If I add a > > time.Sleep(1*time.Millisecond) to a_go.go before the exec, the setuid bit > > is respected every time. > > on my way to bed, I'll give your response a proper read in the > morning, but note that my reproducer causes the issue a lot more > frequently than in "the real world" (snap run calling snap-confine > calling snap-exec), where delays are happening naturally (because the > programs aren't just calling exec, they actually have work to do :-p). > I don't have numbers for how often it happens in snappy; it's a lot > less frequent, but often enough to be annoying when working > interactively (and there are bug reports with these warnings/errors in > lp already). Oh yes, the sleep was just to allow the other threads to settle in the test case program. It's not a solution for the real world at all. Cheers, mwh -- Snapcraft mailing list Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snapcraft
