Hi Kyle (and Sergio!) On 9 February 2017 at 18:45, Kyle Fazzari <kyle.fazz...@canonical.com> wrote: > If you find yourself using cleanbuild a lot (it makes a new ephemeral > container, builds, then destroys the container), you might find some > workflow improvements by simply developing the snap in a container. You > can even bind-mount the source from the host, if you want. This is the > workflow I use personally. It allows for one to fully customize the apt > sources while also utilizing Snapcraft's built-in stage package cache*, > and it doesn't clutter the development environment on the host. > > * In snapcraft 2.27, coming early next week >
You guys! I love reading these teases of what's coming in the next snapcraft. Your fast iterating and understanding of user requirements is making snapcraft a real pleasurable tool to use on a daily basis. Thank you! -- Alan Pope Community Manager Canonical - Ubuntu Engineering and Services +44 (0) 7973 620 164 alan.p...@canonical.com http://ubuntu.com/ -- Snapcraft mailing list Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snapcraft
