2017-02-08 14:37 GMT-02:00 Olivier Tilloy <olivier.til...@canonical.com>:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Simon Fels <simon.f...@canonical.com> > wrote: > Where can this be requested? > > +1. Sorry, this is a hijack. I would like to see an interfaces revamp/discussion. E. g.: - my snap is useless without process-control, but works without home [1]. The previous is mandatory, the later is optional [2]. - why not document if an non-auto interface is mandatory? And, as Olivier said, a mechanism to say: a required interface isn't connected. I am, as an user, interested in using **some** snaps as 1st class software: a 'turbo' text editor, a better archiver, GIMP, ... - No alien "home", no need to copy files around to open them. Claudio [1] it is ok if the user wants to copy files from/to $SNAP_DIRs. [2] In fact, auto-connecting home might be a bad idea. PS: - extending this, what about a filesystem interface: - a text editor snap (or an archiver) can run confined without problems. But, the user might want to open /etc/fstab or a file in a removable media. Sorry if this is offensive, I REALLY apologize. Recently in planet GNOME we was able to read about flatpak "FileChooser portal". To me, it seems to be the needed solution.
-- Snapcraft mailing list Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snapcraft
