On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 23:09:04 +0100, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote: > On 06/02/17 00:00, Sergio Schvezov wrote: >> We removed all traces of license.txt from our >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> drop license file inside the snap wherever you want. > > Just to follow up a little here: I'm honestly not sure I like > this change. It > may not be used by snapd but it makes sense that there should > be an expectation > that each snap package will contain a license file in a > standardized location, > and there should be a standardized way of providing it.
If it is not defined anywhere though, this is just a de-facto standard as it really is upto each person creating there snap about where to put it. > Related to the 2.26 changes: I notice that as of 2.26 any > generated package now > includes a `snap/` directory, even though the `gui` and `snap.yaml` files > included with the generated package still wind up in the `meta/` directory. > > Is this a transitional change (with `snap/` being the intended long-term > location for metadata) or just a bug? Files owned by snapcraft will go in snap, files owned by snapd will go in snapd. All the command wrappers that snapcraft creates will also go in here. -- Sent using Dekko from my Ubuntu device -- Snapcraft mailing list Snapcraft@lists.snapcraft.io Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snapcraft
